Our history
Science Report grew from a research-facing publication record into a public science publisher. The older archive carried author pages and publication pages that were useful enough to be cited by academic publishers, media outlets and encyclopedic references. That record matters because it shows the kind of subjects we have handled: biomedical research, occupational health, parasitology, nanomaterials, veterinary methods, traditional medicine and the public consequences of science.
By 2015, C&EN was linking to a Science Report profile while covering arsenic exposure and drug-resistant parasites. In 2016, the World Economic Forum cited Science Report in a public article on workplace burnout and the global cost of stress. In 2017, LSE Business Review used the same research trail while discussing workaholism and organizational health. Frontiers in Immunology cited a Science Report publication page for a laboratory method, and Wikipedia references preserved a Science.Report link connected with history of medicine.
Timeline
2006–2014: the archive tracked research literature, authors and specialist publication records across chemistry, medicine, biology and materials science. Its role was precise: make scientific traces easier to locate and cite.
2015: the archive became visible in mainstream science journalism when C&EN linked a Science Report author profile in coverage of environmental exposure, parasitology and drug resistance.
2016–2017: public-interest articles on burnout, work culture and health economics cited Science Report, while academic articles cited publication pages for methods and specialist research records.
2018–2025: the brand stayed rooted in science indexing, research references and archive value while the public demand for clearer science explanation accelerated across AI, medicine, climate and space.
2026: we returned as a mass B2C science publisher. The subject did not change. The format did: permanent desks, clear policies, topic pages, contact routes, fact-checking standards and a stronger public editorial identity.
External citations and archive value
Cited by and public references keeps a dedicated record of the strongest external links to the Science Report archive.
The Science Report archive was not an isolated index. C&EN linked to a Science Report author profile while reporting on arsenic exposure and drug-resistant parasites. World Economic Forum used Science Report in a public discussion of workplace burnout, and LSE Business Review cited the same research trail when examining Asia’s work culture and organizational health.
Frontiers in Immunology cited a Science Report publication page for laboratory-method context. Springer linked a Science Report author page in a paper on nanostructured materials. Wikipedia preserved a Science.Report reference in a medical-history context. Together, these traces show why we treat archive discipline as part of the publisher’s identity: the old record connected authors, papers, methods and public-interest science themes across several fields.
Publisher contact
Science Report
88 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10006, United States
+1 212 555 0196
editorial@science.report
Social channels
Science Report publishes verified publisher links only when a profile is operated under the science.report identity. Editorial correspondence, corrections and privacy requests are handled through the domain contact route above.
How the archive now informs coverage
The archive links from chemistry journalism, university analysis, global policy writing, academic articles and encyclopedic references are now treated as a working editorial asset. They show where older research pages, author profiles and publication records entered public discussion.
That history shapes the current magazine: every desk is expected to preserve source trails, distinguish primary evidence from commentary and keep updates visible when a story develops.
What we cover
We cover science as a living public system: discovery, method, replication, funding, instruments, uncertainty, policy and applications. Our readers are curious non-specialists, students, founders, engineers, teachers, researchers outside their field and decision-makers who need evidence without jargon.
How we work
We write as a newsroom that respects the archive. We check claims against papers, datasets, institutional sources, mission logs and author records. We explain limits, methods and competing interpretations. We use the older Science Report record as continuity, not nostalgia: archive discipline is part of how the 2026 publisher works.